Misfit simulation on implant-supported prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases: Part 3: A radiographic evaluation
Accuracy of different maxillomandibular relationship recording techniques in the edentulous maxillary arch
Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):1044-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.025. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches
Intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A narrative review
Effect of 3D printer, implant analog and angulation on the accuracy of analog position in implant casts
Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches
Virtual planning, guided surgery, and digital prosthodontics in the treatment of extended mandible chondrosarcoma
Repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows
Trueness of maxillomandibular relationship in 3D-printed and conventional casts
J Dent. 2024 May 4:105044. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105044
Trueness of Crown Preparation Dies in Dental Models: An In Vitro Assessment of Digital and Analog Workflows
Misfit simulation on implant-supported prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases Part 3 A radiographic evaluation
J Prosthet Dent 2024 Feb 27. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.014. Online ahead of print.
Repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level prosthetic components used in conventional and digital workflows
J Dent. 2024 Jan 14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104835. Online ahead of print.
Influence of Kennedy class and number of implants on the accuracy of dynamic implant navigation: An in vitro study using an X-ray free evaluation methodology
Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: A systematic review
J Prosthodont. 2023 Aug 17. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13751. Online ahead of print.
EPA Consensus Project Paper: Accuracy of Photogrammetry Devices, Intraoral Scanners, and Conventional Techniques for the Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent . 2023 Jun 13. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2481Rutkunas12. Online ahead of print.
Influence of print orientation on the intaglio surface accuracy (trueness and precision) of tilting stereolithography definitive resin-ceramic crowns
EPA Consensus Project Paper: Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Workflows in Partially Edentulous Cases Restored with FPDs over Implants. A Systematic Review
Eur J Prostodont Restor Dent. 2023 Apr 18. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2484Mijiritsky09. Online ahead of print.
The effect of different implant impression splinting techniques and time on the dimensional accuracy: An in vitro study
J Dent. 2022 Nov;126:104267. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104267. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
Model-free digital workflow and immediate functional loading of implant-supported monolithic glass-ceramic crowns: A case series
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104270. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104270 Epub 2022 Aug 21.
The Effect of UV Treatment on Surface Contact Angle, Fibroblast Cytotoxicity, and Proliferation with Two Types of Zirconia-Based Ceramics
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711113.
Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 2: Screw resistance test
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug 15;S0022-3913(22)00286-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.027
Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study
J Dent. 2022 Jun;121:104136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104136 Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Misfit simulation on implant prostheses with different combinations of engaging and nonengaging titanium bases. Part 1: Stereomicroscopic assessmen
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 May 5;S0022-3913(22)00229-3. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.009.
Accuracy of Fixed Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses Additively Manufactured by Metal, Ceramic, or Polymer: A Systematic Review
J Prosthodont. 2022 Mar;31(S1):70-87. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13449.
Dental pulp stem cell-derived extracellular matrix: autologous tool boosting bone regeneration
Cytotherapy 2022 Jun;24(6):597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study
In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep 20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13844.
Comparison of conventional and digital workflows for implant-supported screw-retained zirconia FPD bars: Fit and cement gap evaluation using SEM analysis
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2021 May 12;14(2):199-210. Pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34006081/
Effect of extracellular matrix and dental pulp stem cells on bone regeneration with 3D printed PLA/HA composite scaffolds
Eur Cell Mater. 2021 Feb 23;41:204-215. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v041a15.
The Effect of Different Cleaning Protocols of Polymer-Based Prosthetic Materials on the Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;17(21):7753. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217753.
Assessment of the morphology and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed PLA and PLA/HAp scaffolds
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;104:103616. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103616
Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination
J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):322–329. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.020
Clinical and laboratory passive fit assessment of implant-supported zirconia restorations fabricated using conventional and digital workflow
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;10.1111/cid.12885. doi:10.1111/cid.12885
Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(5):271–279. doi:10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.27
Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:101-120. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28944372
Cytotoxicity of commonly used luting cements -An in vitro study
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):294-301. doi:10.4012/dmj.2014-185. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin
J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(3):254–256. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.015
3D Microporous Scaffolds Manufactured via Combination of Fused Filament Fabrication and Direct Laser Writing Ablation
Micromachines 2014; 5(4), 839-858; doi:10.3390/mi5040839
The Effect of Laser-Treated Titanium Surface on Human Gingival Fibroblast Behavior
J Biomed Mater Res A, 102 (3), 713-20 Mar 2014. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34739.
Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):512-5. Pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22930776/
Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments
Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):845-53. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-057. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Effects of different food colorants and polishing techniques on color stability of provisional prosthetic materials
Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):167-76. doi:10.4012/dmj.2009-075
Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Jan;34(1):41-51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01640.x
Discover our latest videos, packed with insights, tips, and more.